To understand “ALL OF THE MANNERS OF IMPEACHMENT”, one must understand “ALL OF THE MANNERS OF PROSECUTION”, because impeachment is merely “a punishment for wrongdoing”(or an “additional punishment”) that prohibits one from being employed in government office, after it’s occurrence (generally, if not absolutely).
While, as the 1787-U.S. Constitution provides, one may be impeached for a mere “civil verdict or indictment”, this would still require that a “Super-Civil Conviction” (a 2/3rds verdict) be obtained, before all of the due-benefits of “trial by jury” have been provided to the accused...hence, even if a 2/3rds “civil verdict” is obtained in the grand jury, the still-due bifurcated-trial-jury-remainder of due-process/benefits may, thereafter, obtain only a “civil conviction” (by a majority, but, less than 2/3rds) and, effectively, alter or change/superseded the “grand jury finding or verdict”, allowing only “civil penalties or compensation”, instead of the 2/3rds required for impeachment. [It’s also possible, of course, that a bifurcated-trial-jury may find guilt “unanimously and beyond doubt”, warranting not only impeachment, but, arrest/incarceration, whereas the original-grand-jury only found wrongdoing preponderably-by-a-majority-but-less-than-2/3rds of the grand jury]
While this “1787 U.S. Constitution Explicit Process of Impeachment” may be traced back to the “1215 Magna Carta” (if not before), the modifications and standards it represents are, still, basicly, those used by the “U.S. Colonial Forces”, before the 1776 Declaration of Independence and 1777 Articles of Confederation, still in use at the time of the 1787 U.S. Constitution’s passage and ratification (where the civil and criminal aspects of prosecution had been “permanently-bifurcated”, allowing some aspects of criminal trials to be missed in the civil trials and, vice-versa, some aspects of civil trials to be missed in the criminal trials; amounting to the “various forms of mock trials prohibited in 1776” and continued-viable through Article 12 of the 1777 Articles of Confederation and Article 6 of the 1787 U.S. Constitution, amending all contrary provisions). It’s in the 1787 U.S. Constitution, however, that “explicit provisions” (prohibiting these various criminal or civil malfunctions or lapses/addenda) were made, including Article 1, Sections 1-8’s explicit provision of at least one form of “Default Function” (“HOW A BILL OR CIVIL VERDICT BECOMES A LAW OR CRIMINAL VERDICT/WARRANT”, other than via a non-compliance with a Subpoena Duces Tecum or Bill of Attainder”), as well as the explicit prohibition of Bills of Attainder, Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 3.
While these “Post Independence Differences” had, in fact, been “effectively prohibited in 1776”, they often, usually in fact, continued until they were “explicitly prohibited”, as Article 1, Sections 1-8 and Section 9, Paragraph 3 explicitly did. Hence, while “Bills of Attainder” were technicly-prohibited as “mock trial provisions” in 1776, their being provably/reprovably criminally negligent relative to the usage of grand jury presented written demands (that become Default-Convictions in 10 days, Sundays excepted, costing more and taking longer than this “1787 U.S. Constitutional Default Process”), it wasn’t until this “1787 Prohibition of Bills of Attainder” was made that such illegal processes and usages began to be corrected. In fact, via “reprovably erroneous precedent laws”, even this 1787 prohibition didn’t correct or resolve the problem/malfunction. A malfunction/criminal-negligence/misprision/malfeasance, relative to proper “grand jury presentment of written-demands” that continue-on until the passage/ratification of the 1790-5th Amendment’s explicit-mandate/requirement of “grand jury presentment in all matters”(capital/civil or otherwise-infamous/worse crimes), and even continues to this very day.
However, since the relatively-prevalent-existence of grand juries, it became relatively-simple to prove that any other processes than this “proper grand jury function of grand jury presentment of written demands” (that default into default-convictions in 10 days, sundays excepted) is, was, and shall be criminal negligence, misprision, and malfeasance (at least), beyond doubt. Therefore, regardless of what any former-precedent-law/ruling/finding/opinion may have said, any/all other processes than “grand jury presentments of written-demands” (that default into convictions/warrants/laws in 10 days of non-answer/non-compliance/non-payment) is, has been, and shall be criminally negligent (and worse), a ‘mock trial”, since the 1787 U.S. Constitution...and a denial of reprovably-due-process...one need only make a “VOLUNTARY GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT” of such written-demands to prove the fact, beyond doubt, nullifying any/all precedents, rulings, even-statutes to the contrary.
It’s from these scientificly-proven/reprovable certainties of Constitutional Law (NO STATUTES/LAWS TO THE CONTRARY WITHSTANDING, Article 6, 1787 U.S. CONSTITUTION) that we have found a “NEW MEANS OF IMPEACHMENT”, better, more certain, and faster than the “Old Colonial Process”, that is, “VIA DEFAULT”. Though not explicitly-applied to impeachment in 1787’s U.S. Constitution (other than via the “Equal Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” of Article 6, continued from Article 12 of the 1777 Articles of Confederation and the Preamble of the 1776 Declaration of Independence), since the “1787 Prohibition of Bills of Attainder”(A1S9P3) and the 1790-5th Amendment, IMPEACHMENT HAS CONSTITUTIONALLY-REQUIRED SUCH “GRAND JURY PRESENTED WITTEN-DEMANDS”, INSTEAD OF ANY BILLS OF ATTAINDER/AS-SUBPOENA-DUCES-TECUM IN ANY/ALL PRELIMINARY CIVIL PROCEEDINGS OR “ORIGINAL GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS” IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Thusly, since “1787’s prohibition of bills of attainder” (validly defined as “involuntary servitude requiring processes” without a bankruptcy-proceeding first occurring in the matter and/or “involuntary servitude requiring processes for below-bankruptcy-properties in a civil matter”), the only IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS that will Constitutionally-bifurcate into a trial-jury (by the Senate) are those wherein “NO DEFAULTS HAVE OCCURRED”. {That is, where written demands, not bills of attainder/subpoena-duces-tecum-etc., have occurred, but have not been defaulted upon via “non-answer/non-payment/non-compliance”, as if such a Constitutional Default occurs, then, a “Constitutional Conviction Via Default” has occurred and the Warrants and Impeachments of Conviction have already occurred therein, as well, any/all further proceedings, beyond/before enforcement of such warrants being “Constitutionally-Prohibited Acts of Double Jeopardy”.}
In conclusion, since the 1787-Prohibition of Bills of Attainder (replaced by written-demands) and the 1790-Mandate of Grand Jury Presentment, explicity (all other options being reprovably acts of criminal negligence and worse, as VOLUNTARY GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT OF SUCH WRITTEN DEMANDS REPROVES, BEYOND DOUBT, NULLIFYING ALL OPPOSITION), it’s not only been the duty of “Impeachment Prosecutors” to make such grand jury presented “WRITTEN DEMANDS” (instead of Subpoena Duces Tecum or the like), but, citizens need only “MAKE A VALID WRITTEN DEMAND (FOR A VALID DEBT/OBLIGATION, INCLUDING COMPENSATIONS FOR WRONGDOING) TO THE ACCUSED, PRESENTED TO THE GRAND JURY FOR A DEFAULT-CONVICTION AND ANY DUE-WARRANTS OR IMPEACHMENTS THEREUPON TO OCCUR IN 10 DAYS, SUNDAYS EXCEPTED, FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE TO THE ACCUSED”....It’s advised, as well, that those doing so include the phrase “FAIL/REFUSE NOT TO PAY/COMPLY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW” to distinguish anysuch “OFFICIAL GRAND JURY PRESENTED WRITTEN DEMAND” from a mere “collection request”(or the like).
Note: Those interested in engaging in such a “Civic Duty Obligation” may, of course, contact us for assistance on a “what we’d do, if it were us” basis, at USRecovery@Gmail.com. Those desiring College Credits (or official certification) for participation and/or completion of these materials should, at least, start the warranted exam at www.PRLog.Org/10439874. Tax-Deductible-Contributions (and Dividend Bearing Investments) may also be made via the Mastercard account #5249 0500 1320 3067 (“free daily money transfers” for those who purchase a Greendot Card, only “$1.99” at Walmart or 7-11, etc.).
